
Friday, March 12, 2010
Slacker Blogger

Tuesday, March 2, 2010
One for Team J-Man

I know you have been waiting.
You have been wondering.
What happened?
Did we get what we asked for?
So let me take you back to last week, Meeting Day. Head Honcho leaves with promises to "look into" what they could do and if they could "work out" an exception, and to get back to me as soon as possible. And she did. The next morning I received a call from Head Honcho, and it goes something like this (note liberal use of paraphrasing):
HH: Good morning. I wanted to let you know that I have looked into the issue of getting J-man summer service at his child care....
Me: Yes?? (note hopeful sound in voice)
HH: ... and I consulted with Advocacy Agency and two other school districts and they all said that summer sessions are not required to provide those services, so we will not be making any accomidations in the plan that we can provide. We can offer your son ESY in a special needs classroom.
Dead silence on my end.
The Green-Eyed Monster Momma woke up, stretched and muttered "What the *%$....?!?"
HH: ... I know this isn't what you wanted, but it is what we are willing to provide...
GEMM: So, what you are saying is that you just called Advocacy Agency and they said you don't have to do it? And you aren't going to try to help us ...?
HH: Well, yes... you may call Suzy Advocate and talk to her yourself. Her number is .....
GEMM: Yes, I will call her and get back to you. (note cold tone of rage in voice)
So, GEMM calls Suzy Advocate. After an hour of discussion (or arguing... whatever) with Ms. Advocate, she has basically told us this: Because the Extended School Year Rule does not address Least Restrictive Environments, they don't have to comply.
What?!?!
Basically, the argument is that the rule doesn't talk about it, so they don't have to do it?
To me and GEMM, that is complete BS.
I called the Department of Education and talked to the specialist there. I explained the situation, and my confusion about why they would say that they did not have to comply with IDEA/LRE in the summer. She laughed. I asked her if she could provide me with something that explains it. She said "Well, the reason you can't find anything is because there isn't anything! That is not true, and if I was you I would request a mediation meeting" (fancy talk for a sit down with the Department of Ed and hash it out... not to be confused with a Due Process meeting, which is bigger and scarier).
'Nuff said.
A little research later (and lots of Law reading), we wrote a Letter. Allow me to dazzle you with just the highlights:
J-man qualifies for ESY via the "Self Sufficiency requirement. Specifically, J-man needs to maintain skills regarding his IEP goals for social development and communication as reflected in Minnesota Administrative Rule 3523.0755 Subpart 2 D 6 'development of stable relationships with peers and adults" and 7 "basic communication".
ESY is able to comply with IDEA 2004 requirements for Least Restrictive Environments. J-man's educational setting does continue into the summer. Additionally, Minnesota Rule 3525.2335 governing Early Childhood Program Services, Alternatives and Settings states in Subpart 2 B 3 that "A school district must provide direct and indirect special education services by district special education staff attending a community based program". There is no stated waiver or exception for ESY services noted in this or any other rules. Additionally, nowhere in the ESY Rule is there any reference that suggests they are exempt from complying with the requirements of IDEA 2004 for a Free Appropriate Public Education. Indeed, the Minnesota ESY rule apparently only addresses criteria for these services, not the services themselves, and therefore should still need to comply with IDEA. Additionally, IDEA states when implementing ESY services the public agency may not "unilaterally limit the type, amount, or duration of those services".
Yeah. Bite me.
It was sent, and we waited. And waited.
And today... SUCCESS! Apparently, they have found a way to "work it out" for us.
Yep, I thought they might.
Most excellent.
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Battle Interuptis
Essentially, here's what happened. The entire team (Birth to Three, Three to Five, and the Head Honcho) came to the house and we all sat around the table and pow-wowed. The Head Honcho came out strong and a wee-bit hard-assed, and if I was anyone but me I might have caved at that moment and laid down like a rug. She informed me, with a lot of academic high-flalootin programy wordage that they are not required to provide the same services during the summer, they are not held accountable to the Least Restrictive Environment requirement, and that what they have to offer is good enough. Now, this is not what I have read, or heard, and I have done some research....
I didn't cave. I am not sure I came out swinging, but I do believe I made my point clear: J-man greatly benefits from where he is, will not benefit from moving his services to that location, they cannot provide what he needs there, he does qualify and should be able to get services where he is at. I explained that while I understand they don't have the program he is in during the summer, they should. And that, given his unique needs and situation they should make an exception to the hardcore position they have, since what we are asking serves him best and the other option does not.
My hubby popped in and provided our united front, plus a steely eye and presence that says "we mean business". Plus a few well placed (yet polite) words.
She didn't cave.... exactly. What she said was that she would "look into" whether they could make an exception for J-man for the summer. She needed to "consult with others" and will get back to me "soon".
So where does this leave us? Not sure. I know that if they turn us down our next step is to go into mediation with the Department of Education. While we did not out-and-out say we would take it that far, I am fairly sure she got that vibe from us. And we would... in principle alone. However, I find it utterly amazing that we might have to go there.... for 3-4 visits over the summer??? Really??? Don't they have better way to spend their time? So, I am hoping that they can "work something out" so we really don't have to make a mountain out of molehill.
Link UPDATE: For those of you interested, this is a wonderful commentary: Into the Mainstream
Friday, February 19, 2010
Books, I love. And Books I love.

Monday, February 15, 2010
On Meetings and Other Battles
Let me start with the story, and then move on to the rant. It'll be a little more coherent that way.
A few weeks ago we met the J-man's new teacher and speech therapist from the school district. Over the next few weeks we are going to lose Ms Kristin (much to our deep sadness), and Ms Becky and Ms Jane will be working with him at his preschool. Of course, Ms Kristen has set the bar shockingly high, but I am going to remain hopeful that his new teachers will be as excellent.
During this initial meet-&-greet with the new folks, the subject of J-man's ESY (Extended School Year) eligibility came up. Essentially, ESY is summer school in 'special ed' language. And yes, the J-man qualifies. Apparently, however, they do not provide the community based services in the summer like he is getting now. The only way he can get any coverage of either speech or teaching is if we enroll him in their multi categorical classrooms.
Now, we have already addressed the issue of the multicat classrooms. We toured, we considered, and we rejected the idea. The reason he is enrolled at his current preschool is because we believe, strongly, that typical-developing peers are a tremendous benefit to our boy. He has been hugely successful in this environment, and the idea of putting him in an environment that is exclusively with other special needs kids (many of whom have significant behavioral and language issues) does not jive with our goals for him.
Now, the rant.
See, this all goes back to the idea of Least Restrictive Environments and Inclusion. In a nutshell, inclusion is the ideal in which all children learn together, regardless of disability or ability. According to Wrightslaw, the Individuals with Disabilities and Education Act states that the Least Restrictive Environment policy says that school districts are required to educate students with disabilities in regular classrooms with their non-disabled peers to the maximum extent possible.
Dan Habib eloquently deal with the issue of inclusion for his documentary Including Samuel.
I highly recommend this documentary (check out your local PBS station for viewings!)
Now, the issue of inclusion is a thorny one. I know this. Inclusion is difficult to start, requires lots of teacher training, good classroom supports, and a commitment from all involved to make it work. It isn't always easy. Another documentary series, Educating Peter (and later, Graduating Peter), highlights both the challenges and rewards of inclusion (another series I highly recommend).
I believe that whether or not inclusion is appropriate for a child is truly on a case-by-case basis. However, I also believe that.... done well... inclusion should absolutely be the goal for the vast majority of children. And for the J-man... well, this is a no-brainer. His current achievements in preschool, with appropriate support, is crystal clear. Hands down, inclusion is the only way to go. He needs typically developing peers. They help him learn. It is essential.
So now, we get to have a meeting with All-Powerful School District people to argue about getting him some summer service at Jack and Jill. Have I mentioned that we PAY for him to be in preschool... a lot of money...? And we are only talking about 3-5 one hour sessions over the summer to address issues and help him maintain skills?
Yeah.
So I get to be "that parent", and see if I can convince them that his least restrictive environment IS preschool, and they do have an obligation to continue his current programming. Wish me luck, because GEMM might have to peek out on this one.
Saturday, February 13, 2010
Bad Days

Thursday, February 11, 2010
Mother Words
I am taking a writing class. Yes, me... a writing class! Why, you may ask?? I have no idea!
Actually, that is not entirely true. I think I have found a lot of solace in writing this blog, and I just want to be better at it. I have no great aspirations of writing an Oprah Book Club best-seller (Hey Oprah, call me *wink wink*), but I like the idea of treating it more like a craft. I'd like people to enjoy my stories and get something out of them.
The course is called Mother Words and is taught by Kate Hopper. Check out her blog here.
Anyway, I may plop a few of my attempts at "real writing" here. I would love feedback if you have the time!
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
The road is long
I asked her yesterday if, given her experience and what she now sees J-man doing, if she thought Apraxia was the right diagnosis for him.
She said yes. Most definitely.
Of course, we both agree that it isn't the end of the story.... there is more going on that just apraxia. But getting a definitive diagnosis of apraxia has been hard because up until a few months ago, he wasn't making enough attempts to say anything. Now, however, she can "see" the oral-motor sequencing problems.
There are days, when J-man is trying hard and doing good, when I feel like maybe we will see the end of this road sooner rather than later. And then there are days... like today... when I just can't imagine how we will ever make it.
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Three
Welcome to Three!
According to everyone who is anyone, Three is suppose to be a Big Year. I have high hopes for Three. I think Three is gonna be Your Year. I don't exactly know what Three has in store, but I see great and terrible things for Three. I am excited for you and the magical Three.
So Welcome to Three.
I love you more and more everyday.
Mommy
Friday, January 29, 2010
Blogger's Block

Back from vacation for a few days, I have been meaning to write. And I just can't seem to gather my thoughts in any way that makes sense. So I guess I will just write a little update about our trip and try and come up with something cooler later.


This was Daddy's cone for about 2 minutes.
Flying with a toddler with a sinus infection. Mommy was not happy.
So, overall, I give the vacation a "B". Illness and rainy weather aside, it was a good time.
Saturday, January 23, 2010
Into the Warm
We have flown the coop and are "snowbirding" (for a long weekend at least) in lovely Arizona. My parents, bless them, have fled the cold white winter north to warmer climes for the month, and we are completely using them for the weekend so we, too, can get warm. Too bad for us that we came down during a cold weekend in AZ! Ok, 55 F isn't bad, compaired to the great white north... but it isn't balmy either. Ah well, J-man loves to run outside at least! And we have hopes of 60's before we leave.
Sadly, both the J-man and I have wicked colds. Why oh why, always on vacation?!?! Of course, it isn't holding HIM back. He wants to go OU OU OU.
Stay tuned! Many delightful details of our adventures to come!!
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Up High, Down Low
Tonight, the J-man and I attended a Family Fun Night for special needs kids at a local indoor park. Think McDonalds Playland without the french fries. J-man loves the place... and because all the families there were parents and children with special needs, it felt like a place we could be totally free. No one had any expectations, just complete open acceptance. How lovely for all these wonderful kids and their parents!
Anyhoo, at one point the J-man saw the candy machine and insistently signed "eat". I got him a few Skittles and we made our way to the seating area. He signed and said "candy" as he munched. One of the other parents seated next to us asked him his name. Of course, he didn't respond.
Then this man, in a friendly way, asked J-man to 'Give me five'.....
AND HE DID IT!
Jonathan high-fived a perfect stranger! And, to make it even better, he went on and did the "up high/down low" part. I didn't even know he KNEW that.
Isn't it just the little things ....?
Thursday, January 14, 2010
When Mommy Gets Her Butt Kicked
I love the J-man.
Love him.
But he is kicking my booty six ways to Sunday.
Limits: Pushed.
Patience: Tested
Now, I believe that the J-man is experiencing some serious brain growth. He has realized the communication is probably pretty darn important and that.. basically... he sucks at it. So he is frustrated. Impatient. And he is two..nearly three... and thus his favorite activity is doing whatever he wants whenever he wants, especially if mommy doesn't want it.
Ah, finally.... something normal.
Friday, January 8, 2010
Optimism & Hope

Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Innocence

Friday, January 1, 2010
Welcome 2010!

Monday, December 28, 2009
GEMM, Kicking @ss and Taking Names

Sunday, December 27, 2009
On Being Brave
Actually, not shopping. It isn’t like you can get on Ebay and get a therapy dog. I was actually just looking at therapy dog programs specifically for children with developmental delays. I had gone to a parent support group last week and several parents had therapy dogs for their children. One parent talked about how the dog helped with calming during tantrums, the other with communication issues and safety. It was an interesting discussion because I had been thinking for several weeks that a dog might be good for Jonathan. I hadn’t thought as far as a specially trained therapy dog, but nonetheless something appeals to me about the idea of a dog companion for our family.
So, as I am cruising the Internet, I find this video:
I was speechless and in tears. So much about this boy… his face, his smiles, history…reminds me of Jonathan. Not everything, mind you. I would guess that this boy’s need for a therapy dog is greater than the J-man's. Jonathan does not have the same issues. But this video and its song spoke to me.
.
"... the way it always was... just isn't good enough... you make me want to be Brave..." (what a wonderful song)
Being brave means doing what you need to do to help your child. Being brave means living with grief. Being brave means having every kind of hope. Being brave means being more than you thought you could be. Being brave also means loving and laughing in spite of... or maybe even because of... the frustrations you experience. I am meeting such wonderful, brave people on this journey of ours.
So, will we get a Therapy Dog? What do YOU think we should do? Most of the Therapy Dogs are quite expensive (think thousands of dollars)... and our needs right now are small. There is a local place that does some companion dogs that I am looking into. But allow me to encourage YOU to look into these organizations and consider donating a little tax-deductible coin toward the efforts. When you read some of these stories .... oiy, my heart!!
For Whit: http://www.4pawsforwhit.com/
http://www.4pawsforability.org/dream.html
http://www.autismservicedogsofamerica.com/
http://www.puppyloveinc.org/ (Our local place)
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
A Blast from Christmas Past
He was about 9 1/2 months old.
He is still as delightful.
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Driving Mr. Jonathan

There are lots of things to update: recent Word Watch activity, our IEP meeting last week, holiday plans, etc. However, I think I will just tell a little story.
Despite his relatively calm demeanor, the J-Man is a man of action. Clearly, he was meant for parents who are willing to run with the bulls and leap tall buildings with a single bound. Alas, he got us. Much like Tiger Woods, Jonathan likes variety. He likes new and exciting diversions. He is not a “stay at home and veg” kind of kid.
Now, any parent with a language-delayed child learns early on that in order to encourage communication you have to make the kid “work” for the good stuff. They want the cool new toy? Make them say “toy” (or some approximation thereof). A cookie? A drink? A Nintendo Wii? Make’m work for it! Motivation is the key… hookm’ with their heart’s desire and they will try to do the hard stuff for the highly sought reward.
And then … there is Jonathan.
Not much motivates Jonathan enough to really, really, REALLY work for it. He has to want it pretty darn bad. Unless whatever you are asking him for is easy to do, he is likely to move on then keep trying. The list is very short of things he will work for.
So whenever we get one, we pounce, regardless of the consequences.
And this is how we have ended up driving Mr. Jonathan around every night for his “Evening Constitutional”.
Here is how it starts:
Jonathan grabs my hand and pulls me to the stairs. He sits down (2nd stair only, thank you very much) and pulls me down to the floor to sit.
On his own he says, “Coooa” (Coat)
“You want your coat?” I ask.
“Coooooa.” He looks at me expectantly.
“Why?” I ask.
“Gooooo…. By-eeee!” He states impatiently. Emphatically.
And from this point I can elicit any number of other vocalizations. Where are your shoes? Shoo (with the sign) Where is your hat? Haaa (with the sign). Where are your socks? (just the sign for socks… oh well).
But... lest we wish to witness a meltdown… we must go out. Somewhere, anywhere. Preferably the gym playland, but Target will work. And since we are trying to encourage communication and vocalizations, we are giving in to his evening demands.
I don’t mind.
I mean, let’s face it. This is practically a conversation for the J-Man!
Monday, December 7, 2009
When ECFE Breaks My Heart, Part 2

When ECFE Breaks My Heart, Part 1

Saturday, November 28, 2009
The Pursuit of Perfection

Saturday, November 21, 2009
Puzzler


Thursday, November 19, 2009
Kendra's Story
I am lucky to be a NICU nurse.
I am lucky to make a difference.
Not every story ends up like this...
In fact, many don't.
But I get a chance to be a part of the possible.
This is why I do what I do.
Happy Birthday Kendra!
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Goals
So with Jonathan's IEP coming up, I have started thinking about what kind of goals we should be establishing for him this next year. I have been brain storming a list of "good goals" for his IEP.... and I found that this was not an easy task! It is so hard to articulate what his goals should be in a meaningful way. It is so much easier to just say what I want....
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Quiet

Frequently he is so quiet.
Word attempts are sporadic.
I can never predict when
he might make a sound or word.
He doesn't jabber or babble.
Not to himself, and not to us.
At least, not often.
He is quiet.
Some days I think he wants to communicate.
To talk.
Other days I think he is happy being quiet.
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Rockabye



